The universe really is expanding faster than scientists had thought , new research suggests.
Astronomers have pegged the universe’s current expansion rate — a value known as the Hubble constant , after American astronomer Edwin Hubble — at about 44.7 miles (71.9 kilometers) per second per megaparsec. (One megaparsec is about 3.26 million light-years.)
This newly derived number is consistent with a calculation that was announced last year by a different research team, which was led by Nobel laureate Adam Riess. But it’s considerably higher than the rate that was estimated by the European Space Agency’s Planck satellite mission in 2015 — about 41.6 miles (66.9 km) per second per megaparsec. [In Photos: Quasars and the Expanding Universe ]
The cause of this discrepancy is unclear at the moment, scientists said. However, the different types of data these various groups analyzed may provide a clue.
Hubble Space Telescope view of the distant quasar RXJ1131-1231. A foreground galaxy smears the image of the background quasar into a bright arc (left) and creates a total of four images — a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing. Such lensed views allowed scientists to come up with a new estimate for how fast the universe is expanding.
Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA, Suyu et al.
To arrive at the new estimate, the research team — led by Sherry Suyu of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Germany and Frédéric Courbin of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland — studied how massive nearby galaxies warp the light streaming from distant, superbright galactic cores known as quasars. Suyu, Courbin and their colleagues used NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Space Telescope, as well as a number of ground-based instruments, to do this work.
“Our method is the most simple and direct way to measure the Hubble constant, as it only uses geometry and general relativity — no other assumptions,” Courbin said in a statement.
Gravitational lenses occur when the light from a more distant galaxy or quasar is warped by the gravity of a nearer object in the line of sight from Earth, as shown in this diagram.
Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA
Riess and his team analyzed Hubble observations of two different types of “cosmic yardsticks” — Type Ia supernovas (stellar explosions of consistent luminosity) and Cepheid stars, which pulse at rates that are related to their true brightness.
The Planck number, however, is a projection that’s based on the spacecraft’s measurements of the cosmic microwave background — the light left over from the Big Bang that created the universe 13.82 billion years ago.
So the differences in the Hubble constant estimates may reflect something that astronomers don’t understand about the early universe, or something that has changed since that long-ago epoch, scientists have said. For example, it’s possible that dark energy — the mysterious force that’s thought to be driving the universe’s accelerating expansion — has grown in strength over the eons, members of Riess’ team said last year. [7 Surprising Things About the Universe ]
This montage rounds up five of the best lensed quasars (as well as their foreground galaxies) as seen by astronomers with the HOLICOW collaboration. The observations of these quasars allowed scientists to independently measure the Hubble constant and determine that the universe is actually expanding faster than expected.
Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA, Suyu et al
The discrepancy could also indicate that dark matter — the strange, invisible stuff that astronomers think vastly outweighs “normal” matter throughout the universe — has as-yet-unappreciated characteristics, or that Einstein’s theory of gravity has some holes, they added.
“The expansion rate of the universe is now starting to be measured in different ways with such high precision that actual discrepancies may possibly point towards new physics beyond our current knowledge of the universe,” Suyu said in the same statement.
Suyu, Courbin and their colleagues present their results in a series of five papers that will be published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+ . Follow us @Spacedotcom , Facebook or Google+ . Originally published on Space.com .
Comments are closed.