Three planets are known to orbit the pulsar PSR B1257+12, as depicted in this artist’s illustration. The two outermost planets, now officially named Poltergeist and Phobetor, are the first confirmed exoplanets; their discovery was announced in January 1992.
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC)
The Milky Way is littered with a vast diversity of planets: giants that blur the line between planet and failed-star brown dwarf; tiny worlds similar in size to Earth’s moon; planets that take 100,000 years to orbit their suns or whip around in hours; lava worlds; ice worlds; and planets that circle multiple suns or whirling pulsars.
Scientists find them by watching stars that wobble, change gravity, vary in color or dip slightly in brightness. (This last strategy is employed by the most prolific planet hunter of all time, NASA’s Kepler space telescope .) And someone needs to keep track of them all.
Rachel Akeson, deputy director at the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, leads the space agency’s Exoplanet Archive, which is tasked with cataloging the ever-growing horde of planets known to exist outside the solar system. [Wildest Alien Planet Discoveries of 2016 ]
“In 2011, there were about 700 [confirmed exoplanets]; now we’re over 3,400,” Akeson told Space.com. “In the next five years, there’s going to be tens of thousands.”
Those newly discovered exoplanets will come courtesy of various space observatories that are operating now or will come online soon . For example, the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission is precisely measuring the positions of 1 billion Milky Way stars, and the work should allow astronomers to notice movements caused by the pull of many orbiting planets.
And NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is scheduled to launch to 2018 to search for planets all over the sky circling stars relatively close to the sun, using the same method as Kepler.
NASA’s Exoplanet Archive will house them all; the database, which was made publicly accessible in 2013 , lets researchers and enthusiasts understand the distribution and properties of planets found thus far as they come in, as well as data about the stars they orbit and planet “candidates” that have yet to be confirmed. The archive also generates graphs from the latest information to show exoplanet trends.
NASA’s Exoplanet Archive lets users sort and analyze the many planets caught orbiting other stars.
Credit: NASA
Right now, a big part of the Exoplanet Archive takes the shape of a large interactive table of confirmed planets, which have been checked and double-checked by the authors to make sure they’re not flukes in the data. Most of the planets aren’t directly imaged but rather detected via their effects on their parent stars, and confirmations can come from observation by various methods or by a strong pattern of “transits” across their stars.
Five confirmed exoplanets pack together orbiting the system Kelpler-80 in this artist’s illustration. The first was discovered transiting its star in 2013.
Credit: Illustration by Karl Tate, Space.com
The archive also hosts data about the stars’ light curves when they’re available, showing their brightening and dimming, as well as Kepler data that has not been confirmed as a planet’s signature. It keeps a list of false positives, too, and the list is always in flux; additions and changes in status are implemented continuously.
“Things can go in and then come back out,” Akeson said. “And I think in one case, something went in, came out and has gone back in. There’s this series of papers in the literature — basically two groups arguing with each other via the papers — whether or not this is the planet signature versus another kind of signature.”
An exoplanet’s data is officially added only once it appears in a peer-reviewed publication.
As more and more planets come in, researchers can use the archive to begin to understand the galaxy’s overall distribution of planets. Different methods of detection find different kinds of planets. For instance, transit measurements from Kepler or TESS are more likely to find planets that orbit close to their stars, and Gaia should generally find planets that orbit farther away, Akeson said. With current technology, systems like Earth’s would still be hard to find, and so researchers don’t know how common they are.
“We have no system that looks like the solar system yet, where you have these small, rocky planets on the inside and then several gas giants on the outside,” Akeson said. “We’re now getting to the point where we’re starting to see things that are true Jupiter analogues, but the Earth analogues are very hard to find still.”
This image of the Jupiter-like exoplanet 51 Eridani b was taken in near-infrared light with the Gemini Planet Imager Dec. 21, 2014, revealing the planet for the first time. The bright central star has been mostly removed to enable the detection of the million-times fainter planet.
Credit: J. Rameau (UdeM) and C. Marois (NRC Herzberg)
Going forward, a thorough survey could help researchers understand how planetary systems evolve and why our solar system is the way it is, instead of featuring mini-Neptune and super-Earth planets like researchers have found in other star systems.
As scientists continue to discover exoplanets, the catalogue will keep growing. The archive’s researchers are talking to groups of users to determine the most helpful way to display the information, and planning the best ways to wrangle and verify the new waves of planets, Akeson said.
“We are going to have to keep up,” she said.
Email Sarah Lewin at slewin@space.com or follow her @SarahExplains . Follow us @Spacedotcom , Facebook and Google+ . Original article on Space.com .
Comments are closed.